The Impact of Societal Risk Attitudes on Terrorism and Counterterrorism
نویسندگان
چکیده
We analyze decisions made by a group of terrorists and a target government in a zero-sum game in which the terrorists minimize, and the government maximizes, the expected utility of the median voter in the target country. The terrorists’ strategy balances the probability and the severity of the attack while the government chooses the level of investment reducing the probability and/or mitigating the severity of attacks. We find that risk aversion affects the strategies of both the government and the terrorists, leading to more severe, less frequent attacks but not necessarily more counterterrorism expenditures.
منابع مشابه
Know thy enemy: Education about terrorism improves social attitudes toward terrorists.
Hatred of terrorists is an obstacle to the implementation of effective counterterrorism policies-it invites indiscriminate retaliation, whereas many of the greatest successes in counterterrorism have come from understanding terrorists' personal and political motivations. Drawing from psychological research, traditional prejudice reduction strategies are generally not well suited to the task of ...
متن کاملObama’s Counterterrorism Policy and the Washington Post’s Editorials: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Media-State Interaction
American mass media’s relation with the US government in foreign policy decision-making has been the subject of numerous studies in the interdisciplinary field of political communication. This paper reexamines the interaction between the media and the government in the US foreign policy decision-making process, analyzing the possible congruity and/or incongruity between The Washington Post...
متن کاملTerrorism, Security, and the Threat of Counterterrorism
In America, Britain and Australia the threat of terrorism has been used to justify radical new legislation that gives police and intelligence agencies unprecedented powers to detain and question people believed to have information connected to terrorism. In this paper I explore the nature of the threat of non-state terrorism—threat to national security and the well-being of citizens. I argue th...
متن کاملThe Impact of Emotion in the American Public’s Assessments of and Reactions to Terrorism
A convergence of social psychological research suggests that emotions have a powerful effect on attitudes, beliefs, and decisions, being one of the main forces that guide people toward these assessments. Given the powerful influence of emotions in these essential processes, this type of research is critical to understanding the mechanism of this influence. Recently, some researchers have explor...
متن کاملCamera Surveillance as a Measure of Counterterrorism?
Camera surveillance has recently gained prominence in policy proposals on combating terrorism. We evaluate this instrument of counterterrorism as resting on the premise of a deterrence effect. Based on comparative arguments and previous evidence on crime, we expect camera surveillance to have a relatively smaller deterrent effect on terrorism than on other forms of crime. In particular, we emph...
متن کامل